ABSTRACT
Background: There are limited studies evaluating the impact of COVID-19-related interruptions on hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening in endemic countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of HBV testing in a community pharmacy in Freetown, Sierra Leone, from October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2022. We compared participant characteristics using Pearson's chi-square test. We evaluated trends in HBV screening and diagnosis using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's or Dunnett's post-test. Results: Of 920 individuals screened, 161 had detectable HBsAg (seroprevalence 17.5% [95% CI 14.9-20.4]). There was a 100% decrease in HBV screening during January-June of 2020; however, screening increased by 27% and 23% in the first and second year after COVID-19, respectively. Mean quarterly tests showed a significant upward trend: 55 - 6 tests during January-March (baseline), 74 - 16 tests during April-June, 101 - 3 tests during July-September, and 107 - 17 tests during October-December (one-way ANOVA test for trend, F = 7.7, p = 0.0254) but not the mean quarterly number of people diagnosed with HBV (F = 0.34, p = 0.7992). Conclusion: Community-based HBV screening dramatically improved following temporary disruptions related to COVID-19. Seasonal variation in HBV screening, but not HBV diagnosis, may have implications for HBV elimination efforts in Sierra Leone and other West African countries.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hepatitis BABSTRACT
Objectives: People living with HIV (PWH) are at increased risk of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality, yet less is known about COVID-19 vaccination uptake and hesitancy, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine uptake and hesitancy among PWH in Sierra Leone. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of PWH in routine care at Connaught Hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone from April through June 2022. We collected sociodemographic and health-related data. We used the VAX Scale, a validated instrument to assess attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. From the responses, we constructed hesitancy (VAX) scores, with higher scores implying negative attitudes toward vaccination. We used generalized linear models to identify factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. Results: A total of 490 PWH were enrolled (71.4% female, median age 38 years, median CD4 count 412 cells/mm3, 83.9% virologically suppressed). About 17.3% had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. The mean VAX score was 43.14 {+/-} 7.05, corresponding to 59.9% of participants classified as vaccine-hesitant. Preference for natural immunity (65.8%) and concerns about commercial profiteering (64.4%) were the commonest reasons for hesitancy, followed by mistrust of vaccine benefits (61.4%) and worries about future side effects (48.0%). In adjusted regression analysis, being Muslim ({beta} = 2.563, p < 0.001) and residence in urban areas ({beta} = 1.709, p = 0.010) were associated with greater vaccine hesitancy, while having tested ever for COVID-19 was associated with lesser vaccine hesitancy ({beta} = -3.417, p = 0.027). Conclusion: We observed a low COVID-19 vaccine uptake and high hesitancy among PWH in Sierra Leone. Our findings underscore the need to address vaccine hesitancy as a critical element of efforts to boost COVID-19 vaccine uptake among this population in Sierra Leone.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , HIV InfectionsABSTRACT
Introduction: Good Infection prevention and control (IPC) is vital for tackling antimicrobial resistance and limiting health care-associated infections. We compared IPC performance before (2019) and during the COVID-19 (2021) era at the national IPC unit and all regional (4) and district hospitals (8) in Sierra Leone. Methods: Cross-sectional assessments using standardized World Health Organizations IPC checklists. IPC performance scores were graded as inadequate = 0–25%, basic = 25.1–50%, intermediate = 50.1–75%, and advanced = 75.1–100%. Results: Overall performance improved from ‘basic’ to ‘intermediate’ at the national IPC unit (41% in 2019 to 58% in 2021) and at regional hospitals (37% in 2019 to 54% in 2021) but remained ‘basic’ at district hospitals (37% in 2019 to 50% in 2021). Priority gaps at the national IPC unit included lack of: a dedicated IPC budget, monitoring the effectiveness of IPC trainings and health care-associated infection surveillance. Gaps at hospitals included no assessment of hospital staffing needs, inadequate infrastructure for IPC and lack of a well-defined monitoring plan with clear goals, targets and activities. Conclusion: Although there is encouraging progress in IPC performance, it is slower than desired in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is urgent need to mobilize political will, leadership and resources and make a quantum leap forward.
ABSTRACT
Background As of 26 March 2021, the Africa CDC had reported 4,159,055 cases of COVID-19 and 111,357 deaths among the 55 African Union Member States; however, no country has published a nationally representative serosurvey as of May 2021. Such data are vital for understanding the pandemic's progression on the continent, evaluating containment measures, and policy planning. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, nationally representative, age-stratified serosurvey in Sierra Leone in March 2021 by randomly selecting 120 Enumeration Areas throughout the country and 10 random households in each of these. One to two persons per selected household were interviewed to collect information on socio-demographics, symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, exposure history to laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases, and history of COVID-19 illness. Capillary blood was collected by fingerstick, and blood samples were tested using the Hangzhou Biotest Biotech RightSign COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette. Total seroprevalence was was estimated after applying sampling weights. Findings The overall weighted seroprevalence was 2.6% (95% CI 1.9-3.4). This is 43 times higher than the reported number of cases. Rural seropositivity was 1.8% (95% CI 1.0-2.5), and urban seropositivity was 4.2% (95% CI 2.6-5.7). Interpretation IgM positivity was elevated as of March 2021 suggesting the second wave had not yet fully abated. Although overall seroprevalence was low compared to countries in the Global North (suggesting relatively successful containment in Sierra Leone), our findings indicate enormous underreporting of active cases. This is concerning because it may reflect significant underreporting of incidence and mortality across the continent. The low level of natural immunity is also worrisome in that it presents a very large population of susceptible individuals at risk for future variant waves in a country with only 0.2% of people fully vaccinated.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Introduction Very little is known about possible clinical sequelae that may persist after resolution of the acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). A recent longitudinal cohort from Italy including 143 patients recovered after hospitalisation with COVID-19 reported that 87% had at least one ongoing symptom at 60 day follow-up. Early indications suggest that patients with COVID-19 may need even more psychological support than typical ICU patients. The assessment of risk factors for longer term consequences requires a longitudinal study linked to data on pre-existing conditions and care received during the acute phase of illness. Methods and analysis This is an international open-access prospective, observational multi-site study. It will enrol patients following a diagnosis of COVID-19. Tier 1 is developed for following up patients day 28 post-discharge, additionally at 3 to 6 months intervals. This module can be used to identify sub-sets of patients experiencing specific symptomatology or syndromes for further follow up. A Tier 2 module will be developed for in-clinic, in-depth follow up. The primary aim is to characterise physical consequences in patients post-COVID-19. Secondary aim includes estimating the frequency of and risk factors for post-COVID- 19 medical sequalae, psychosocial consequences and post-COVID-19 mortality. A subset of patients will have sampling to characterize longer term antibody, innate and cell-mediated immune responses to SARS-CoV-2. Ethics and dissemination This collaborative, open-access study aims to characterize the frequency of and risk factors for long-term consequences and characterise the immune response over time in patients following a diagnosis of COVID-19 and facilitate standardized and longitudinal data collection globally. The outcomes of this study will inform strategies to prevent long term consequences; inform clinical management, direct rehabilitation, and inform public health management to reduce overall morbidity and improve outcomes of COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus InfectionsABSTRACT
Background Sepsis is a major contributor to global mortality with an estimated 700, 000 sepsis-related deaths annually. As sepsis is an acute complication of COVID-19, the ongoing pandemic can increase its global burden. Despite this, there is still limited research evidence on COVID-19 and sepsis. In this scoping review, we described the research data on sepsis and septic shock among patients with COVID-19.Methods We adapted Arksey and O’Malley framework by reviewing relevant studies published on medRxiv, PubMed, and Google Scholar between January 01, 2020, and April 16, 2020, on sepsis and septic shock with the publication language restriction to English. The findings included the prevalence and outcome of COVID-19 patients with sepsis or septic shock, sepsis criteria, laboratory data, and the treatment given to COVID patients.Results Of the 16 eligible articles included in this review, 13 (81.2%) were conducted in China. With the exception of one article, the research work for all the articles was conducted in adult patients. The articles were retrospective studies (12, 75%), case reports (3, 18.8%) and prospective observational studies (1,6.2%). The estimated prevalence of sepsis and septic shock range from 6.8–100% and 4–28.9%, respectively. Serum lactate, platelets, C-reactive protein, white cell counts, and procalcitonin were elevated in 24.5%, 6.2%, 31.2%, 62.5%, 43.8% and 37.5% of the articles, respectively. Bacterial cultures were documented in 4(25%) of the eligible articles. 12 (75%) and 11 (68.8%) articles documented the use of antivirals and antibiotics, respectively. Other antimicrobials used among COVID-19 patients were hydroxychloroquine (1,6.3%), chloroquine (1, 6.3%), and unspecified antifungal drugs (2, 12.5%). Supportive therapies like oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, and fluid therapy were documented in 12(75%), 13 (81.3%), and 2 (12.5%) articles, respectively. The highest and lowest mortality among the study participants is 29.8% (134) and 5.4% (12), respectively.Conclusion There is a paucity of data in the literature on sepsis in COVID-19 despite its high burden among the COVID-19 patient population resulting in a high rate of antimicrobial use that is not backed by clearly documented microbiology laboratory support. Research is needed to understand the burden of sepsis in COVID-19.